Local self-government organizations of public associations. Public associations, types, structure, registration

MUNICIPAL ASSEMBLY OF INTERCITY MUNICIPAL FORMATION ALEKSEEVSKY IN THE CITY OF MOSCOW

DECISION

On the interaction of local governments of the intracity municipality Alekseevskoye in the city of Moscow with public associations

In order to implement the issue of local importance, established by paragraph 18 of Article 8, the Municipal Assembly decided:

1. Approve the Regulations on the interaction of local governments of the intracity municipality Alekseevskoye in the city of Moscow with public associations (appendix).

3. This decision comes into force from the day of its official publication.

4. To impose control over the execution of this decision on the Head of the intracity municipality Alekseevskoye in the city of Moscow Zinoviev A.D.

Head of the intracity

municipality

Alekseevskoye in the city of Moscow A.D. Zinoviev

Appendix

to the decision of the municipal

Intracity meetings

municipality

Alekseevskoe in Moscow

REGULATIONS on the interaction of local governments of the intracity municipality Alekseevskoye in the city of Moscow with public associations

I. General provisions

This Regulation determines the procedure for interaction between local government bodies of the intracity municipality Alekseevskoye in the city of Moscow - the municipal Assembly, the municipality, the Head of the municipality (hereinafter LSG bodies) and public associations created in accordance with federal laws (public organization; public movement; public fund; public institution; body of public amateur performance; political party, as well as unions (associations) of public associations) and operating on the territory of the intracity municipality of Alekseevskoye in the city of Moscow (hereinafter - WMO), in order to implement the issue of local importance, established by paragraph 18 of Article 8 of the Law of the City of Moscow dated November 6, 2002 N 56 "On the organization of local self-government in the city of Moscow" .

1. This Regulation applies to the joint resolution of issues of mutual interest of LSG bodies and public associations.

2. The subject of regulation of this Regulation is the relationship arising in accordance with the legislation in the field of local self-government and public associations between public associations and LSG bodies in connection with the exercise of the legal rights of citizens to exercise local self-government, both directly and through their representatives in local self-government bodies , in order to protect common interests and achieve common goals.

This Regulation does not establish the procedure for the interaction of LSG bodies with non-governmental non-profit organizations (hereinafter referred to as NPOs) in terms of providing NPOs for gratuitous use non-residential premises, transferred to local self-government bodies for the implementation of certain powers of the city of Moscow to organize leisure, social, educational, physical culture, health and sports work with the population at the place of residence.

3. Interaction is defined as a set of joint activities aimed at resolving issues that correspond to the competence of the participants in the interaction and affect the interests of the WMO population, public associations, LSG bodies.

4. The regulation establishes the principles, directions, forms of interaction between LSG bodies and public associations.

Public associations that are legal entities, in accordance with the law on public associations, when interacting with local governments in the city of Moscow (hereinafter referred to as LSG bodies), have the right to:

Freely disseminate information about their activities;

Participate in the development of decisions of local governments in the manner and to the extent prescribed by law Russian Federation and the city of Moscow;

Represent and protect their rights, the legitimate interests of their members and participants, as well as other citizens in local governments and public associations;

To fully exercise the powers provided for by laws on public associations;

Take initiatives on various issues public life to submit proposals to local self-government bodies.

II. Principles of interaction

The interaction of LSG bodies with public associations is carried out on the basis of the following principles:

1. legality;

2. publicity;

3. voluntariness and mutual interest in joint activities in order to support and develop specific civil initiatives of Moscow residents, which are constructive and creative;

4. coordination of actions and pooling of efforts in the joint solution of issues, taking into account the interests of the participants in the interaction;

5. non-intervention of LSG bodies and their officials in the main activities of public associations, as well as non-interference of public associations in the activities of LSG bodies and their officials;

6. independence in the implementation of their own tasks and powers, as well as in the development of forms and methods for using their own forces and their own funds;

7. non-economic basis of interaction with the lack of targeted funding or municipal grants from local budgets for the implementation of socially useful programs, projects, events, public and civil initiatives of public associations;

8. systemic nature of equal partnership cooperation;

9. trust in resolving issues of joint activities;

10. responsibility of each of the participants in the interaction for the fulfillment of the obligations assumed, defined in bilateral agreements (contracts).

III. Directions of interaction

The main areas of interaction between LSG bodies and public associations are:

1) participation of public associations in the discussion of programs, plans or individual events developed by LSG bodies in resolving issues of local importance and / or delegated state powers;

2) participation in the formation and development of decisions of LSG bodies on issues of local importance;

3) submission of initiatives and proposals to LSG bodies by public associations on issues related to the implementation of their statutory goals for the purpose of activating the population in resolving issues of local importance;

4) participation of LSG bodies in the discussion of projects and programs of public associations aimed at the development of civil initiatives of the population on the territory of the WMO;

5) holding joint actions and events on issues within the powers of LSG bodies;

6) joint participation in measures to ensure security on the territory of the WMO (public policing points, anti-terrorist district commissions for combating terrorism, measures to prevent offenses, neglect, environmental control, etc.);

7) joint participation in the organization and conduct of military-patriotic and social educational events with children and youth;

8) joint activities for the development of children's, youth and student social movements;

9) joint activities to educate the population on issues of local self-government;

10) joint activities in popularization healthy lifestyle life, physical education, sports, leisure of WMO residents;

11) joint activities to inform the population about the activities of local self-government bodies, public associations, interaction with executive authorities;

12) participation of public associations in conducting surveys of the population to determine the needs of residents in sports and leisure services, their focus and accessibility;

13) participation in monitoring (on the activities of LSG bodies, environmental monitoring, etc.);

14) participation of representatives of public associations in activities to control and evaluate the quality of services provided municipal institutions, NGOs for organizing leisure, social and educational, physical culture and health and sports work with the population at the place of residence;

15) joint activities in organizing and holding events dedicated to the celebration of significant dates in Russia, Moscow, local holidays;

16) other areas of interaction provided for by laws, legal acts of the city of Moscow, bilateral agreements (contracts).

IV. Forms of interaction

LSG bodies and public associations for the implementation of areas of interaction and joint resolution of issues:

Create joint councils, working groups and commissions;

Conclude bilateral agreements (contracts) on joint activities;

Form plans and programs of joint activities to address issues of local importance and delegated powers;

Carry out joint research, generalization of problems and identification of the reasons for the low activity of the population in solving issues of local importance and participation in leisure, social and educational, physical culture and health and sports activities and events;

Organize joint (commission) control activities in accordance with the competence of LSG bodies;

Create conflict commissions in case of conflict situations on the WMO territory;

Organize meetings with the population, including thematic meetings with the main target audiences of the population;

Carry out an information exchange of information of mutual interest and directly related to the implementation of joint tasks, summarize and analyze best practices in resolving issues of local importance and exercising delegated powers by LSG bodies of other WMOs in the city of Moscow;

Plan and conduct local events aimed at preventing offenses, ensuring the safety of the population, preventing neglect;

Interact with resources mass media prepare publications on topical issues of informing the population;

Organize and conduct joint festive local events, other entertainment events, reviews, competitions, exhibitions;

They organize and conduct thematic conferences, seminars, consultations for the purpose of legal education of the population.

V. Powers of public associations in interaction with LSG bodies

Public associations, within the competence defined in bilateral agreements (contracts), have the right to:

Receive from officials of local self-government bodies information, certificates, documents and / or copies of them necessary for resolving joint issues;

Participate in discussions of plans, programs developed by LSG bodies;

Participate in meetings of the Municipal Assembly in accordance with the Regulations, meetings held by LSG bodies, at the invitation of their leaders;

Submit, in the prescribed manner, draft legal acts, comments and proposals on resolving issues of local importance, delegated powers;

Submit for discussion socially oriented activities, projects, programs for their inclusion in the action plans of LSG bodies;

Participate in inspections of compliance with the requirements for the sanitary condition of facilities (sports grounds, non-residential premises) and the adjacent territory, the safety of their use for the population;

Send materials on violation of consumer rights or the quality of municipal services to LSG bodies for consideration of issues in the prescribed manner;

Place information on joint activities with LSG bodies in public information systems.

Mariyskiy legal bulletin

R. V. Gornev

SOME PROBLEM ASPECTS OF INTERACTION OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES AND PUBLIC ASSOCIATIONS

The article is devoted to the problems of interaction between local self-government and public associations. Public associations are one of the institutions of civil society and the interaction of local governments with them should be aimed at solving problems that arise in the municipality. We believe that it is necessary to legislate the forms and methods of legal interaction between local governments and public associations.

Keywords: local self-government, public associations, non-profit organizations, interaction, forms.

The problem of civil society, the interaction of its elements with public authorities is one of the fundamental scientific problems of our time. It appeared with the emergence of the state and the division of society into state and non-state spheres of human activity. At the same time, if in the field of interaction of public authorities with civil society institutions and public associations, in particular, some problems have now been resolved1 2, then the sphere of interaction of local government with public associations is still poorly understood. In addition, it should be noted the imperfection of the actual legislative regulation of the interaction of local governments with public organizations.

In addition to the above, it is worth noting the absence in legal science integrated research direct interaction of public associations with local governments. All of the above determines the relevance of the topic chosen for the study.

The legal definition of local self-government is contained in various normative legal acts and documents. In the legal literature, it is noted that the Constitution of the Russian Federation does not directly offer an exhaustive legal interpretation of local self-government, as a result of which an illusion is created of the admissibility of an overly broad interpretation of this phenomenon in Russian conditions3. The variety of constitutional characteristics

1 Lysenko V. V. Civil society and public associations in the Russian Federation // Actual problems constitutional and municipal law. - 2001. - No. 1. - S. 25.

2 Sheryazova A. S. Relationships government agencies and public associations: constitutional and legal aspect: author. dis. ... cand. legal Sciences. - Krasnodar, 2011.

3 Knyazev S. D. Local self-government in the Russian Federation: constitutional nature and significance for municipal law // Journal of Russian law. - 2008. - No. 6.

At first glance, the risk of local self-government, coupled with their well-known inconsistency and disorder, makes it possible to speak with equal success both of the absolute independence (isolation) of municipal institutions from the state administration system, and of the most rigid dependence on it. In this regard, we believe that of particular importance for understanding the essence of local self-government are the provisions of the European Charter of Local Self-Government1 2. In accordance with Article 3 of this international legal act, local self-government is understood as the right and ability of local self-government bodies to regulate and manage a significant part of public affairs and manage it, acting within the framework of the law, in accordance with its competence and in the interests of the local population.

Neither Russian legislation, nor the specified international legal act leave no doubt about the essence of local self-government. This is an independent level of public authority in the state, one of the forms of democracy. At the same time, sometimes in the legal literature one can find statements about local self-government as an integral part of civil society, motivation is given about the interest of citizens in solving local problems in the local territory, independent initiatives of the population. Such independence is associated with the fundamental principle of civil society - its independent position in relation to the state. However, it seems correct to say that local self-government cannot be identified with one of the elements of civil society3. It seems that local self-government is a kind of bridge between civil society and the state.

In the legal literature, public associations are defined as “the most important institutions of civil society, amateur and self-governing associations of its members, voluntarily created to realize various personal interests of the subjects of these organizations and through their universal dependence and interconnection to solve public interests”4.

In the works of domestic researchers V. S. Nersesyants and E. A. Lukasheva, it is noted that public associations are “a legal form of the relationship between the individual and society”5, “a form of limitation of claims

1 Volkov V. E. Local self-government: constitutional grounds legal regulation competencies of municipalities: author. dis. ... cand. legal Sciences. - Chelyabinsk, 2007. - S. 3.

2 European Charter of Local Self-Government ETS No. 122 // СЗ RF. - 1998. - No. 36. -St. 4466.

3 Uvarov A. A. Local self-government and civil society // Constitutional and municipal law. - 2008. - No. 15.

4 Soldatov S. A. Public organizations in the Russian Federation (political, legal and institutional research). - M, 1994. - S. 34.

5 Nersesyants V.S. The history of the ideas of legal statehood. - M, 1993. - S. 15.

Mariyskiy legal bulletin

power ..., a counterbalance to the omnipotence of state power, designed to ensure

read its limitation and self-restraint.

A public association is an independent, self-governing element of civil society independent of public authorities, the main purpose of which is to realize the goals and interests of its members.

At the same time, I. V. Mersiyanova expresses a point of view about public associations as elements of local self-government. In justification, the author notes that this point of view, in contrast to the legal interpretation, more fully reflects social entity local self-government as a system of subjects, objects, relationships and relationships between them, functioning to meet the needs of the population1 2. Without going into the sociological essence of the issues under study, we note that public associations, being an important institution of civil society, are not belong to the system of public authority and are independent of it.

It is noted that non-profit organizations (respectively, public associations, including) are active part people who took up the decision social problems and formed for this formal or informal groups. Therefore, they are one of the institutions of civil society, and the interaction of local governments with them should be aimed at solving problems that arise in the municipality3.

Recommendation 139(2003) of the Congress of Local and regional authorities Council of Europe "On Non-Governmental Organizations and Local and Regional Democracy" establishes that local non-governmental organizations fulfill their tasks in the life and work of citizens. They, being organized on a voluntary basis, play an important role within the framework of their statutory tasks and in accordance with the rules of their activity in building a genuine civil society, bringing citizens closer to local governments, and in strengthening genuine pluralistic democracy. A partnership based on a common desire, both on the part of local authorities and non-profit organizations, allows you to strengthen local democracy and increase citizen participation by reducing the distance between local authorities and citizens, ensuring that all opinions and positions are taken into account.

1 The priority of human rights as a defining principle of the rule of law. General theory of human rights / otv. ed. E. A. Lukasheva. - M, 1996. - S. 25.

2 Mersiyanova I. V. Public associations as an element of local self-government: problems of institutionalization: author. dis. ... cand. sociological Sciences. - Stavropol, 2010.

3 Social policy in municipalities: textbook / under total. ed. N. A. Volgina, V. K. Egorova, S. V. Kalashnikov. - M., 2006. - S. 418.

2. Issues of public law in Russia and foreign countries

This partnership is based on the need to bring the decision-making process closer to the level of citizens and expand the mechanisms for consultation, information and participation of citizens in the assessment of new forms of governance at the territorial level, as well as towards the process of constant coordination of actions between NGOs and local authorities. This partnership is characterized by the complementarity of the services that can be provided to citizens at the local level, on the one hand by local authorities, and on the other by NGOs, in many areas, such as social sphere, education, culture, environment, urban planning and management natural resources in the context of sustainable development of territories1.

In the context of reforming the domestic legal policy in the area under consideration, it seems expedient to legislatively improve the forms and methods of interaction between local governments and public associations. In particular, in our opinion, the following forms of interaction should be enshrined in the Federal Law “On Public Associations”1 2:

1) involvement of representatives of public associations in the work of temporary working bodies for the development of draft municipal legal acts;

2) participation in the electoral process at the local level;

3) conclusion of contracts and agreements on interaction between local governments and public associations;

4) participation of public associations in the development of decisions taken by local governments within the framework of permanent advisory councils, expert councils, public chambers, round tables.

In addition, it is necessary to improve existing and create new expert and advisory councils, public chambers, which will be a kind of "platform" for legal interaction between local governments and public associations. We believe that these measures will have a positive impact on the mechanism of interaction between local government and public associations.

1 Recommendation 139(2003) of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe “On NGOs and Local and Regional Democracy” // On the Participation of Citizens in Public Life at the Local Level. Obninsk: Institute municipal government(series "Documents of the Council of Europe"), 2005. - S. 26-27.

2 the federal law dated May 19, 1995 No. 82-FZ “On public associations” // SZ RF. - 1995. - No. 21. - Art. 1930.

Mariyskiy legal bulletin

SOME PROBLEMS OF THE CONNECTION OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC ASSOCIATIONS

This article covers the problems of the connection of the local government and public associations is actual and insufficiently explored question nowadays. Public associations are one of the institutes of the civic society. Connection of the local government and public associations should be directed on the decision of the problems by municipality. We consider it is necessary to legislate forms and means of law connection local government and public associations.

Keywords: local government, public associations, uncommercial associations, connection, forms.

GORNEV Roman Vadimovich - post-graduate student of the Department of Constitutional and administrative law Mari state university, Yoshkar-Ola.

Email: [email protected]

GORNEV Roman Vadimovich - Postgraduate Student of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law of Mari State University, Yoshkar-Ola.

In public associations, the dependence of the status of public associations on their territorial sphere of activity has been established. Mandatory indication of the territorial scope of activity public association must contain in the name of the organization. There are four territorial types of public associations:

All-Russian public association can carry out its activities in the territories of more than half of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and has its own structural units- organizations, departments or branches and representative offices. Currently, the Russian Federation consists of 85 subjects. Lack of required quantity structural subdivisions is a violation and may lead to the liquidation of the public association. The inclusion in the names of all-Russian public associations of the name Russian Federation or Russia, as well as words derived from this name,allowed without special permission.
Interregional public association carries out its activities in the territories of less than half of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and has its own structural subdivisions there - organizations, departments or branches and representative offices. To obtain this status, it is enough to have branches in at least 2 constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Interregional public associations have a special structure, which, as a rule, consists of regional and local branches.
Regional public association, the activity of such an association in accordance with its statutory goals is carried out within the territory of one subject. For example, the Moscow Public Organization for the Protection of Consumer Rights, as the very name of the organization implies, operates in Moscow.
local public association conducts its activities within the territory of only one local government. For example, the Losinoostrovskaya Local Public District Organization of Motorists operates on the territory of the Losinoostrovskoye intracity municipality of the city of Moscow.

Branches has the right to acquire the rights of a legal entity and is also entitled to carry out activities on the basis of its charters registered in the prescribed manner. At the same time, the goals and objectives of the branches should not contradict the charter of the parent public association. It is the possibility of a regional branch to become an independent legal entity that leads to the fact that when creating a regional branch, it should have at least three members representatives of this region. Since the public association is created on the initiative of the founders - at least three individuals and/or public associations.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Hosted at http://www.allbest.ru/

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

State educational institution higher professional education

Cheboksary Polytechnic Institute (branch)

Moscow State Open University

Test

by discipline: Municipal management

on the topic: Public associations and non-profit organizations in the system of local self-government

Completed by: 5th year student

Ivanova Ekaterina Valerievna

checked by: Golovina T.M.

Cheboksary 2013

Introduction

1. General concepts of a non-profit organization

2. Features of interaction between non-profit organizations and local governments

3. Forms of interaction and cooperation between local governments and non-profit organizations

Conclusion

Bibliography

Introduction

The most important role of local self-government in the modern state structure of the Russian Federation is determined by the fact that it ensures the protection of the joint interests of citizens living in urban, rural settlements, and other municipalities.

The presence of local self-government implies that in the country, along with the interests of the individual and the interests of the state, local (municipal) interests are also recognized and guaranteed - interests related to solving issues of direct support for the livelihoods of the population, and not the population in general, but the specific population of each individual city, settlement, village, village, aul, etc. At the same time, municipal interests are considered not as subordinate to the state, but as interests equal to them.

The Constitution of the Russian Federation (Article 12) classifies local self-government as one of the most important components of the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation. It is recognized and guaranteed by the fundamental law of our state.

The system of local self-government in Russian municipalities is traditionally viewed as a set of organizational forms in which citizens exercise local self-government.

For more than a decade, we have been observing the processes of restructuring public relations in the system of local self-government, when the organized public not only claims to play a role in solving local issues, but also actively fulfills it. First of all, here we are talking about non-state / non-municipal non-profit organizations (hereinafter referred to as NPOs) created as a result of self-organization of citizens.

The balance of power in the system of local self-government has always been shifted towards local self-government bodies. It is to them, and not to the forms of direct democracy of the population, that the decisive role is attributed in choosing the directions for the development of the system of local self-government. The opinion is expressed that "it is only thanks to them that the entire system of local self-government moves and develops, and that practically any impulse associated with the participation in local self-government of the population or territorial public self-government bodies is mediated by the implementation of the relevant powers of local self-government bodies."

However, local governments lack the ability to resolve issues of local importance on their own. Against this background, the role of other entities that can take on issues of local importance is increasing. In this case, we mean the activities of local NGOs, which, although legally they are not an element of the local self-government system and are not even classified as other forms of public participation in local self-government, nevertheless, their obvious contribution to solving local issues prompts the sociologist to record this phenomenon. and identify their role as new elements of the local self-government system.

This control work is devoted to questions about the interaction between NGOs and local governments, its forms and intensity.

1. General concepts of a non-profit organization

A non-profit organization (NPO) is an organization that does not have profit making as the main goal of its activities and does not distribute the profits received among the participants.

If an NPO intends to act as a participant in civil law relations (acquire property rights and obligations), then it must undergo procedures state registration to acquire the rights of a legal entity.

The process of functioning of organizations of the non-profit sector is somewhat different from the activities of commercial organizations and includes two levels: the main and entrepreneurial activities.

The main activity of an NPO is an activity that corresponds to the goals for which this organization was created and which is provided for by its founding documents. An NPO may carry out one or more activities.

Conducting the main activity is the main function of the NPO. It is this activity of NPOs that is supported and stimulated by the state through the provision of benefits in paying taxes, receiving orders, etc. NPOs receive such benefits from the state in exchange for the obligations of the former to carry out their main activities, which in most cases come down to the implementation of the most important social programs.

Entrepreneurial activity of an NPO must meet three conditions:

1. should not be the main goal of the NPO's activities;

2. serve the purposes of the organization, i.e. to strengthen its material and technical base, to be a source of formation of property used for the purposes of the organization, to attract members of the organization to work;

3. comply with the statutory goals of the organization and not go beyond its statutory legal capacity.

2. Features of interaction between non-profit organizations and local governments

Interaction between local self-government bodies and non-state non-profit organizations (NPOs) has certain specifics in comparison with similar relationships between NPOs and state authorities.

First, the sphere of activity of both interacting subjects are issues of local importance. On the one hand, the NGOs themselves, operating at the local level, are primarily aimed at meeting the needs of the population in the system of local self-government. Almost two-thirds (68%) of local government officials and municipal employees believe that it is local NGOs that play the most prominent role in the life of their municipalities, i.e. organizations operating within the territory of the local government. Every eighth respondent (12%) ascribes this role to regional organizations, every seventh (14%) - branches of all-Russian public associations. On the other hand, municipal officials see the expediency of the participation of non-governmental non-profit organizations in solving most issues of local importance, and most often in urban areas. Thus, in urban districts, all thirty issues of local importance are mentioned in this row, and only seven of them are mentioned less frequently than by every tenth respondent. In them, the expediency of participation of NGOs is most often noted in solving such issues of local importance as:

· creating conditions for organizing leisure activities and providing residents with the services of cultural organizations (67%);

providing conditions for the development of mass physical culture and sports (62%);

· organization of improvement and gardening of the territory, use and protection of urban forests (62%);

· protection and preservation of cultural heritage sites (monuments of history and culture) of local importance (59%);

· Creation of conditions for mass recreation and arrangement of places for mass recreation of the population (59%);

organization of security measures environment (56%).

A similar situation is developing in settlements - urban and rural. However, respondents rural settlements demonstrate less interest in the participation of NGOs in solving similar issues of local importance than in urban settlements.

Thus, officials of local self-government bodies and municipal employees most often see the expediency of the participation of NGOs in solving issues of local importance in cities - in urban districts and urban settlements. Moreover, at this level, the demand for NPO activities is more often expressed by respondents from urban districts.

The population of cities, villages and settlements also assigns a certain role in solving their pressing problems to public and other non-profit organizations. The expected role of NGOs in addressing issues of improving the quality of human potential comes to the fore. So, their role is seen in solving the problems of drunkenness, alcoholism; the spread of drug addiction; falling morals, aggressiveness, indifference of people; increase in the number of beggars, homeless people, vagrants, homeless children. The solution of the problems of improvement, cleanliness of the city (village, settlement) by the efforts of public and other non-profit organizations also comes to the fore. Next come the issues of ecology, environmental pollution. Every seventh person considers organizations as subjects that can contribute to improving the provision and increasing the availability of cultural, entertainment, and sports facilities.

Secondly, the nature of interaction between NGOs and local governments has specific features for the types of municipalities. Differentiation of impressions from this interaction results in various estimates the roles that NGOs and civil initiatives play in the public life of municipalities. Thus, in general, every second respondent from among the officials of local governments and municipal employees ascribes to them the role of an intermediary between the authorities and the population (more often respondents from urban districts and municipal districts). According to 45% of the respondents, NGOs and civil initiatives help to catch interests and moods in time, which otherwise would have resulted in unconstructive actions.

A similar trend is observed in determining the role of a constructive opponent of the authorities, helping to see problems, bottlenecks, and shortcomings. NGOs and civil initiatives in some cases help to replace local authorities authorities in dealing with local issues. The role of NGOs and civic initiatives as helpers, partners, and opponents is much more noticeable in urban districts than in rural areas.

Apparently, these roles can be strengthened if stable relationships are established in the communicative space "NGOs - local authorities". However, the lack of support and interest from local authorities is the main problem in the functioning of the organization.

3. Forms of interaction and cooperation between local governments and non-profit organizations

self-government municipal non-profit

To what extent are they common various forms interaction between local governments and NGOs, both tangible and intangible, that can really contribute to increasing the sustainability of the functioning of NPOs?

The prevalence of these forms is markedly differentiated by types of municipalities. Most often, these forms are used in urban districts. So, for example, the provision of municipal grants takes place in every third city district and only in every tenth municipal district. Of the non-material forms of interaction, the leaders are public councils, as well as the receipt of information and methodological assistance by NGOs from the authorities.

Against the background of the limited distribution of these forms of interaction, there is also insufficient support for NGOs by local governments.

Table 1. List of forms of support and cooperation of local governments with NGOs at the municipal level (by types of municipalities, %)

	Types of municipalities
	urban districts	Municipal areas	urban settlements	Rural settlements
Presentation of municipal granites
Placement of social order
NPOs performing work under contracts with authorities that are not social orders
Participation of NGOs in joint public councils with authorities
Participation of NGOs in the implementation of municipal programs (without social order)
Participation of NGOs in joint working groups with authorities, negotiation platforms, conciliation and conflict commissions
Providing NCOs with property support from the authorities
Obtaining information by NGOs from authorities
Providing NGOs with information, analytics to authorities
Providing NGOs with educational programs for municipal employees
Participation of NGOs in educational programs represented by the authorities
Obtaining methodological assistance to NGOs from authorities
Provision of NPOs with methodological assistance to authorities

This is evidenced by the ratio of the proportion of municipalities, which municipal officials call specific types NGOs and civil initiatives as deserving of support and as really supported. In almost all positions, the share of municipalities in which these types of NGOs and civil initiatives deserve support. This does not apply only to religious communities, organizations and movements, for which these shares practically coincide. The largest gap is observed in organizations created for self-organization in the housing sector: homeowners' associations (deserve support in 44% of municipalities, are actually supported - in 27%); territorial public self-governments(47% and 32%); house committees, elders in houses and entrances (40% and 26%). In the same category are charity organisations. They are followed by the degree of decreasing difference between deserving and actually supported NPOs: garden and dacha associations, school and student governments, and consumer rights protection societies.

Polls have shown that veterans' associations, societies of the disabled, women's organizations of the national-patriotic movement, etc., are the most demanding for support.

In urban districts, more often than in other types of municipalities, respondents name most types of NPOs as worthy of support.

Among NGOs, public associations most often enter into contacts with local self-government bodies. Most often, consumer cooperatives and autonomous non-profit organizations do not enter into such interaction. In total, NPOs are involved in non-material forms of interaction with local governments.

Thus, NGOs in Russian municipalities could further strengthen their role in solving local issues, since the authorities themselves expect these actions from them (more often in urban areas). Interaction with local governments can become a serious resource for NGOs to develop and strengthen their sustainability. However, non-material forms predominate among the forms of interaction, while the institutionalization of material forms of interaction is of decisive importance to strengthen the subjective role in resolving issues of local importance. The situation by types of municipalities is heterogeneous. On the one hand, forms of interaction between local governments and NGOs are more common in urban districts. On the other hand, of interest from the point of view of such interaction are specially identified types of municipalities that go beyond the four legally established types - urban districts, municipal districts, urban and rural settlements. The application of this typology will allow a deeper understanding of the essence of the types of interaction between local governments and NGOs in municipal Russia.

Public organization " Parent meeting": Solving the shortage of kindergartens

Against the backdrop of a general rise in civic activity, the topic of the lack of kindergartens is becoming very popular among citizens, many of whom are directly confronted with it. In many cities, initiative groups and public organizations are emerging that seek to solve problems by a variety of means - from rallies to mutual assistance among parents. Residents of Samara managed to advance the farthest - a public organization "Parents' meeting" was created here.

The members of the organization consider their main task not to be protest actions - although they have nothing against those who hold them - but to develop a dialogue with the authorities, on which the solution of the problem depends. There seems to be some progress. According to Nadezhda, it is felt that officials understand the scale and severity of the problem and are ready to look for ways to solve it. In recent years, 10 former kindergartens have been returned, which were occupied in the 1990s various organizations and institutions.

Conclusion

Local self-government bodies do not have the opportunity to resolve issues of local importance on their own. Against this background, the role of other entities that can take on issues of local importance is increasing. In this case, we mean the activities of local NGOs, which, although legally they are not an element of the local self-government system and are not even classified as other forms of public participation in local self-government, nevertheless, their obvious contribution to solving local issues prompts us to record this phenomenon and identify their role as new elements of the local self-government system.

A non-profit organization is an organization that does not have profit making as the main goal of its activities and does not distribute the profit received among its participants.

NPOs can be created in the form of public or religious organizations (associations), non-profit partnerships, institutions, autonomous NPOs, social, charitable and other foundations, associations and unions, as well as in other forms provided for by federal laws.

The activity of NGOs in addressing issues of local importance is expected and demanded by officials of local governments and municipal employees. This helps to strengthen the position of local NGOs as real elements of the local self-government system, which can potentially acquire an important feature of an institutional nature - legal registration. The forms of interaction between the authorities and the public could contribute to the sustainability of the non-profit sector at the local level. However, their potential has not yet been fully explored. In this regard, it becomes necessary to develop measures to support NGOs from local governments, which will ultimately help strengthen the local government systems themselves to manage the processes associated with its life support.

Bibliography

1. Civil Code RF part 1.

2. Uvarov A.L. Local self-government in Russia. - 3rd ed., revised. M.: Norma, 2008.

3. Mersiyanova I.V. Issues of state and municipal management, 2008.

Hosted on Allbest.ru

...

Whether or not this publication is taken into account in the RSCI. Some categories of publications (for example, articles in abstract, popular science, informational journals) can be posted on the website platform, but are not counted in the RSCI. Also, articles in journals and collections excluded from the RSCI for violation of scientific and publishing ethics are not taken into account. "> Included in the RSCI ®: yes	The number of citations of this publication from publications included in the RSCI. The publication itself may not be included in the RSCI. For collections of articles and books indexed in the RSCI at the level of individual chapters, the total number of citations of all articles (chapters) and the collection (book) as a whole is indicated. "> Citations in the RSCI ®: 9
Whether or not this publication is included in the core of the RSCI. The RSCI core includes all articles published in journals indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus or Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) databases."> Included in the RSCI ® core: No	The number of citations of this publication from publications included in the RSCI core. The publication itself may not be included in the core of the RSCI. For collections of articles and books indexed in the RSCI at the level of individual chapters, the total number of citations of all articles (chapters) and the collection (book) as a whole is indicated.
The citation rate, normalized by journal, is calculated by dividing the number of citations received by a given article by the average number of citations received by articles of the same type in the same journal published in the same year. Shows how much the level of this article is above or below the average level of articles of the journal in which it is published. Calculated if the journal has a complete set of issues for a given year in the RSCI. For articles of the current year, the indicator is not calculated. "> Normal citation for the journal: 9.68	The five-year impact factor of the journal in which the article was published for 2018. "> The impact factor of the journal in the RSCI:
Topic normalized citation is calculated by dividing the number of citations received by a given publication by the average number of citations received by publications of the same type of the same thematic direction published in the same year. Shows how much the level of this publication is above or below the average level of other publications in the same field of science. For publications of the current year, the indicator is not calculated."> Normal citation in the direction: 4,105

Local self-government organizations of public associations. Public associations, types, structure, registration

REGULATIONS on the interaction of local governments of the intracity municipality Alekseevskoye in the city of Moscow with public associations

I. General provisions

II. Principles of interaction

III. Directions of interaction

IV. Forms of interaction

V. Powers of public associations in interaction with LSG bodies

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Similar Documents