Assessment of exam tasks in Russian. K2 Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text

I. Structure of the examination paper

The examination paper in the Russian language consists of three parts:

Part 1(A1-A30) contains 30 tasks. Each of them has 4 possible answers, only one of which is correct.
Part 2(B1-B8) contains 8 tasks, the answers to which must be formulated independently.
Part 3(C1) consists of one task and is a small written work by text (composition).

Long-term statistics show that the most difficult tasks of the examination paper in the Russian language for all participants are found in part 2, the easiest - in part 1.

Part 1 work (A1-A30) checks the assimilation of educational material by graduates on basic level difficulties.
All tasks part 2(B1-B8) refer to high level difficulties.
Part 3(C1-composition) is a task of an increased level of complexity.

II. Checking the examination paper

Parts 1 and 2 checked with a computer. Therefore, attention should be paid to correct design answers.

This small written work on the text (essay) is performed on the source text and checked by experts.
- An essay-reasoning has a clear structure and logic and must be built according to certain laws: it must contain a thesis and arguments;
- the volume of the essay - at least 150 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted (it is estimated at zero points), the task is considered not completed;
- the essay should be written in neat, legible handwriting;
work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated;
- if the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work is estimated at 0 points.

III. Evaluation of the examination work

The correct answer, depending on the complexity of each task, is estimated by one or more points. Points received for all completed tasks are summed up.

Each correct answer in the tasks of part 1 (A) brings 1 primary point. If two or more answers are given (including the correct one), an incorrect answer or no answer, 0 points are given.

For the correct answer to tasks B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6, B7, 1 point is given, for an incorrect answer or its absence - 0 points.
Task B8 is evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4 points. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the number of the term from the list, the examiner receives 1 point:

4 points: no errors
3 points: 1 mistake was made
2 points: 2 errors were made
1 point: only one number is correct
0 points: completely wrong answer (wrong set of numbers) or its absence).

For completing the task of part 3 (C1), the maximum number of primary points is 23.
The results of parts 1 and 2 are processed automatically.
The task of part 3 © is checked by two independent experts. If the experts disagree on the assessment of the work, then a third expert is appointed.

The maximum number of primary points for the entire work is 64 (100 test points).

Below are the criteria for evaluating an essay (essay) at the Unified State Examination in the Russian language for 2019. In the new Russian language demos 2019 evaluation criteria have been changed K2 And K4.

What can give the most points:

• 5 points - for commenting on the problem source code- K2
• 3 points - for literacy: spelling (K7) and punctuation (K8)

Arguing your own opinion on the problem - REMOVED in 2019!

Criteria for evaluating the answer to task 27

K1 Statement of source text problems

• 1 point The examinee (in one form or another in any part of the essay) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.
• 0 points. The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text. *If the examinee did not formulate or formulated incorrectly (in one form or another in any part of the essay) one of the problems of the source text, then such a work according to the criteria K1-K4 is estimated at 0 points

K2 Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text

• 5 points. 2 examples-illustrations from the read text that are important for understanding the problem. An explanation is given for the 2 given examples. The semantic connection between them is revealed. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment.
• 4 points. The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee brought at least 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem. An explanation is given for the 2 examples given, but no semantic connection between them is revealed,
  or a semantic connection between the examples is revealed, but an explanation is given for only one example. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment
• 3 points. The problem formulated by the examinee is commented on based on the source text. The examinee brought at least 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem, but an explanation is given for only one example, the semantic connection between the examples is not revealed, or the examinee brought 1 illustration example from the read text, important for understanding the problem, and gave an explanation to it. There are no factual errors related to understanding the problem of the original text in the comment.
• 2 points. Examinee led 2 illustration examples from the read text, important for understanding the problem, but did not explain their meaning.
• 1 point Examinee led 1 illustration example from the read text, important for understanding the problem, but did not explain its meaning.
• 0 points. Examples-illustrations from the read text that are important for understanding the problem are not given, or
  the problem is commented without relying on the source text, or the comment contains factual errors (one or more) related to the understanding of the source text, or commented on another problem not formulated by the examiner, or instead of a comment, a simple retelling of the text is given, or instead of a comment, a large fragment of the source text is quoted.

K3 Reflection of the position of the author of the original text

• 1 point The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no actual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.
• 0 points. The position of the author of the original text by the examinee is formulated incorrectly, or the position of the author of the original text is not formulated.

K4 Attitude to the position of the author on the problem of the source text

• 1 point The examinee expressed his attitude to the position of the author of the text on the problem (agreeing or disagreeing with the author) and substantiated it.
• 0 points. The examinee did not express his attitude to the position of the author of the text, or the examinee's thoughts do not correspond to the formulated problem, or the examinee's opinion is stated only formally (for example, "I agree / disagree with the author")

II. Speech design of the essay

K5 Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation

• 2 points. The examinee's work is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: - there are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; - there are no violations of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
• 1 point The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, but 1 logical error was made, and/or there is 1 violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
• 0 points. In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, but more than 1 logical error was made, and/or There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text.

K6 Accuracy and expressiveness of speech

• 2 points. The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech. * The highest score for this criterion is received by the examinee only if the highest score is obtained according to criterion K10.
• 1 point The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, but the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, or the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, but there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought.
• 0 points. The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.

III. Literacy

K7 Compliance with spelling rules

• 3 points. There are no spelling errors (or 1 minor error).
• 2 points. No more than 2 mistakes were made.
• 1 point 3-4 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. More than 4 mistakes were made.

K8 Compliance with punctuation rules

• 3 points. There are no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error).
• 2 points. 1–3 mistakes made
• 1 point 4-5 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. More than 5 mistakes were made.

K9 Language Compliance

• 2 points. There are no grammatical errors.
• 1 point 1-2 mistakes were made.
• 0 points. More than 2 errors were made.

K10 Compliance with speech norms

• 2 points. No more than 1 speech error allowed.
• 1 point Made 2-3 mistakes.
• 0 points. More than 3 errors were made.

K11 Ethical Compliance

• 1 point There are no ethical errors in the work.
• 0 points. admitted ethical errors(1 or more).

K12 Maintain factual accuracy in background material

• 1 point There are no actual errors in the background material.
• 0 points. There are factual errors (1 or more) in the background material.

Maximum amount points for the entire written work (K1–K12) - 24 points.

• When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account.When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words.
• The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words. If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 26 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.
• If in an essay less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are evaluated, the task is considered unfulfilled.
• When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:

• K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
• K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made).

1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:

• K7 - no more than two errors were made;
• K8 - one or three mistakes were made;
• K9 - grammatical errors No;
• K10 - no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to the K7–K12 criteria is not given for a work of 70 to 150 words.

• If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is estimated at 0 points.
• If the work, which is a rewritten or paraphrased source text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.

Solve in Russian

Ahead is the 2018-2019 academic year, which will be the graduation year for many Russian schoolchildren who are already worried about successfully passing the Unified State Exam and successfully entering a good university.

We will tell you how exam papers are checked in various subjects, how the scale for converting USE scores into grades works, and what innovations can be expected in 2019.

Principles for evaluating the work of the USE 2019

For several recent years the USE system in a number of subjects has undergone significant changes and was brought to the optimal (in the opinion of the organizers) format, which allows to fully assess the amount of knowledge of the graduate in a particular subject.

No fundamental changes are expected in 2018-2019, and we can say with confidence that the same principles will be applied to evaluate the work of graduates as in 2017-2018:

1. automated verification of forms;
2. involvement of experts in checking tasks with detailed answers.

How does the computer evaluate?

The first part of the examination paper involves a short answer to the questions posed, which USE participant must be entered on a special answer sheet.

Important! Before starting the work, be sure to read the rules for filling out the form, as an incorrectly executed work will not pass an automated check.

It is quite difficult to challenge the result of a computer check. If the work was not counted due to the fault of the participant who incorrectly filled out the form, the result is equated to unsatisfactory.

How do experts evaluate?

In many subjects, in addition to the test part, there are tasks that require a full detailed answer. Since it is impossible to automate the process of checking such answers, experts are involved in the verification - experienced teachers with a long work experience.

When checking the exam, the teacher does not know (and even with a strong desire cannot find out) whose work lies in front of him and in which city (region) it was written. Verification is carried out on the basis of uniform assessment criteria developed specifically for each subject. Each work is checked by two experts. If the experts agree, the assessment is put on the form, but if independent appraisers disagree, then a third expert is involved in the verification, whose opinion will be decisive.

That is why it is important to write legibly and accurately so that there is no ambiguous interpretation of words and phrases.

Primary and test scores

Based on the results of the test, the USE participant is awarded a certain number of primary points, which are then transferred to text (points for the entire test). In different subjects, a different maximum of primary points is provided, depending on the number of tasks. But after bringing the result according to the corresponding table, the USE participant receives the final test score, which is the official result of his final tests (maximum 100 points).

So, in order to pass the exam, it is enough to score the established minimum threshold for the initial score:

	Minimum points
	primary	test
Russian language
Mathematics (profile)
Informatics
Social Studies
Foreign languages
Biology
Geography
Literature

Focusing on these numbers, you can accurately understand that the exam has been passed. But what kind of assessment? The online scale of 2018 will help you with this, designed specifically for converting primary USE scores into test ones, which will also be relevant for the results of 2019. A handy calculator can be found on the website 4ege.ru.

Announcement of official results

Graduates are always concerned about the question - how quickly can you find out what result was obtained when passing and what will be the scale for converting points scored on the exam into traditional grades in 2019.

Teachers are often taken to reassure students by working through the tasks of the USE tickets immediately after the exam and evaluating the quality of the work done by the pupils and the amount of primary points scored. Official results must be expected for 8-14 days, according to the established regulations for the USE-2019. On average, the organizers approve the following inspection schedules:

• 3 days to check the work;
• 5-6 days for information processing at the federal level;
• 1 working day to approve the results of the SEC;
• 3 days to post results online and transfer data to educational institutions.

In the event of unforeseen situations and technical problems, these terms may be revised.

You can find out the owl score:

• directly at your school;
• on the check.ege.edu.ru portal;
• on the gosuslugi.ru website.

Converting points to grade

Since 2009, the results of the USE have not been included in the graduate certificate. Therefore, today there is no official state system transferring the USE result into an assessment on a school 5-point scale. As part of the introductory campaign, the test score scored in the exam is always summed up and taken into account. But, many students are still interested to know how they passed the exam - 3 or 4, 4 or 5. For this, there is a special table that details the correspondence for each of the 100 points for each of the subjects.

Ratings Using such a table is quite inconvenient. It is much easier to find out how you passed the Russian language, mathematics or history using the 4ege.ru online calculator, which also contains the USE score conversion scale, which is relevant for 2019 graduates. Having received the result of the exam, it is worth deciding on the university as soon as possible, comparing your capabilities with the real competition for the specialties of interest. Thus, the practice of past years shows that in some cases it is difficult to get into the most popular areas in the capital's universities even with high scores, because not only holders of 100-point USE results, and winners of the largest Olympiads of the 2018-2019 academic year.

In the Unified State Examination in the Russian language 2017, 25 tasks are evaluated, of which 24 are tests, and 25 are an essay on the text. To date, in test tasks it is necessary either to write down the words correctly (and not just find them), or to find two correct answers from the proposed ones (tasks 1 and 15), or to name the numbers indicating the correct setting of commas. Task 7 remains difficult, where you need to correlate erroneous sentences with the rules according to which errors were made.

1 point for a correct answer, 0 points for an incorrect one	0 to 2 points	0 to 4 points	0 to 5 points
For the correct completion of tasks 2–6, 8–14, 16–23, the examinee gets 1 point. For an incorrect answer or its absence, a 0 points.	For completing tasks 1 and 15, from 0 to 2 points can be set. The answer is considered correct if it has all the numbers from the standard and is missing other numbers. 1 point is given if: one of the numbers indicated in the answer, does not meet the standard; one of the numbers specified in the standard is missing response. In all other cases, 0 points are given.	Task 24 can be assigned from 0 to 4 points. Faithful	Task 7 can be assigned from 0 to 5 points. Faithful the answer is considered in which there are all the numbers from the standard and there are no others numbers. For each correctly indicated digit corresponding to the number from list, the examinee receives 1 point.
Maximum Points
Minimum Points

Criteria for evaluating an essay

		Points
	Statement of source text problems
	The examinee (in one form or another) correctly formulated one of the problems of the original text. There are no factual errors related to the understanding and formulation of the problem.
	The examinee could not correctly formulate any of the problems of the source text.
	Commentary on the formulated problem of the original text
	The problem formulated by the examiner is commented. There are no factual errors related to understanding the source text in the comments.
	The problem formulated by the examinee is commented, no more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to the understanding of the source text.
	The problem formulated by the examinee is not commented, more than 1 factual error was made in the comments related to the understanding of the source text, commented on another problem not formulated by the examiner, a simple retelling of the text or its fragment is given as a comment, a large fragment of the original text is cited as comments.
	The examinee correctly formulated the position of the author (narrator) of the source text on the commented problem. There are no actual errors related to understanding the position of the author of the source text.
	Argumentation by the examinees of their own opinion on the problem
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, one of which was taken from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature).
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given at least 2 arguments, based on knowledge or life experience), conducted only 1 argument from fiction, journalistic or scientific literature.
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem formulated by him, posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), argued it (given 1 argument), based on knowledge, life or reading experience.
	The examinee expressed his opinion on the problem posed by the author of the text (agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author), but did not give arguments, OR the examinee's opinion is only formally stated (for example: "I agree / disagree with the author"), not reflected in the work at all.
	SPEECH DESIGN OF AN ESSAY
	Semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, speech coherence and sequence of presentation: There are no logical errors, the sequence of presentation is not broken; There are no violations of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
	The work of the examinee is characterized by semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of presentation, 1 logical error was made, there is 1 violation of paragraph articulation of the text in the work.
	In the work of the examinee, a communicative intent is visible, more than 1 logical error was made, There are 2 cases of violation of paragraph articulation of the text.
	Accuracy and expressiveness of speech
	The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the variety of the grammatical structure of speech.
	The work of the examinee is characterized by the accuracy of the expression of thought, the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech is traced, the work of the examinee is characterized by a variety of grammatical structure of speech, there are violations of the accuracy of the expression of thought.
	The work of the examinee is distinguished by the poverty of the dictionary and the monotony of the grammatical structure of speech.
	LITERACY
	Compliance with spelling rules
	no spelling errors (or 1 minor error)
	1-2 mistakes made
	more than 2-3 mistakes made
	more than 3 errors	0
	Compliance with punctuation rules
	no punctuation errors (or 1 minor error)
	made 1-2 mistakes
	made 2-3 mistakes
	more than 3 errors	0
	Language Compliance
	no grammatical errors
	made 1-2 mistakes
	more than 2 errors
	Compliance with speech norms
	no more than 1 speech error
	made 2-3 mistakes
	more than 3 errors
	Compliance ethical standards
	there are no ethical errors in the work
	ethical mistakes made (1 or more)
	Maintain factual accuracy in background material
	there are no factual errors in the background material
	factual errors (1 or more) in the background material
	Maximum score per essay

When assessing literacy (K7-K10), the volume of the essay should be taken into account. The assessment standards indicated in the table are designed for an essay of 150-300 words. If the essay contains less than 70 words, then such work is not counted and 0 points are scored, the task is considered failed.

When counting words, both independent and auxiliary parts of speech are taken into account. Any sequence of words written without a space is counted (for example, "after all" - one word, "yet" - two words). Initials with a surname are considered one word (for example, "M.Yu. Lermontov" - one word). Any other characters, in particular numbers, are not taken into account when calculating (for example, "5 years" - one word, "five years" - two words).
If the essay contains a partially or completely rewritten text of the review of task 24 and / or information about the author of the text by the examinee, then the volume of such work is determined without taking into account the text of the review and / or information about the author of the text.

When evaluating an essay with a volume of 70 to 150 words, the number of permissible errors of four types (K7–K10) decreases.

2 points for these criteria are given in the following cases:
K7 - there are no spelling errors (or one minor mistake was made);
K8 - there are no punctuation errors (or one minor mistake was made).

1 point for these criteria is given in the following cases:
K7 - no more than two errors were made;
K8 - one or three mistakes were made;
K9 - no grammatical errors;
K10 - no more than one speech error was made.

The highest score according to the K7–K12 criteria is not given for a work of 70 to 150 words.

If the essay is a paraphrase or a completely rewritten source text without any comments, then such work for all aspects of the test (K1-K12) is estimated at 0 points. If the work, which is a rewritten or paraphrased source text, contains fragments of the text of the examinee, then only the number of words that belongs to the examinee is taken into account during the check. A work written without relying on the text read (not on this text) is not evaluated.

In accordance with the Procedure for conducting the state final certification for educational programs middle general education(Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated December 26, 2013 No. 1400 was registered by the Ministry of Justice of Russia on February 3, 2014 No. 31205) “61. According to the results of the first and second checks, the experts, independently of each other, set points for each answer to the tasks of the examination USE work with a detailed answer... 62. In case of a significant discrepancy in the scores given by two experts, a third test is scheduled. A significant discrepancy in scores is determined in the assessment criteria for the corresponding academic subject. The expert who performs the third check is provided with information about the scores given by the experts who previously checked the examination paper.
A significant discrepancy is considered to be a discrepancy of 8 or more primary points between the sums of points given by the first and second experts for completing task 25 (for all 12 assessment positions). In this case, the third expert must give points only for those assessment items for which the points given by the first and second experts differ.